21 December 1998
Pakistan's trip to India precariously poised
By Lateef Jafri
Cricket followers and fans cannot but be happy over reports of the
likely renewal of Indo-Pakistan confrontation at the Test level on
grounds of the neighbouring country. "Likely" because there are
usually many imponderables in the way of a visit to India.
It is possible the Foreign Office may take an overall view of the
security situation across the border and advise the Sports Ministry
and the Federal Sports Board against giving a green signal to such a
trip. It is possible the logistics may be deemed too hazardous or the
government may consider the arrangements in India as unsatisfatory.
However, the top officials of the cricket boards of the two countries
are quite optimistic about reaching a concord on the venues, boarding
and lodging as well as the launching of the Asian Test championship.
They think that like the Independence Cup of May last year, the
Indo-Pakistan schedule can safely be staged much to the delight of
the cricket enthusiasts of South Asia. In the searing heat of the
Independence Cup, in which Pakistan reached the finals, they were
given the attractive settings of Mohali near Chandigarh, Gwalior (now
converted into a cricket centre), Chennai in the south and the famous
Eden Gardens in the east to play their matches. Many may point out
that Toronto had been a regular meeting place for the Sahara Cup
tussles but those one-day combats are set in far-off northern America
and this year's ties were held as per programme last September. A
full tour - Test ties plus limited overs duels - will be a welcome
development after a lapse of 11 years.
The February-March 1987 series - the last one to be held in India -
was in many respects historic for when it appeared that the battle of
attrition will end in a stalemate Pakistan, under the bold and keen
leadership of Imran Khan, clinched the 'decider' and the series at
Bangalore.
The visiting batsmen made a beeline to the pavilion, failing to read
the deceitful flight and turn of Maninder Singh, crashing to what was
their lowest-ever total of 116 against India. The spectators at the
Chinaswamy Stadium were excited at the prospect of their squad's
triumph. There was applause from the enclosures for the Indians'
effort. Perhaps Pakistan were down and out. India took a lead, though
a marginal one. The visiting spinners, Tauseef and Iqbal Qasim, did
not allow the Indian batsmen to take liberties.
Pakistan again did not fare well against the slow stuff sent by
Maninder, Shastri and Yadev and only a rearguard action by the lower
order pushed the score to 249, giving the Indians a target of 221 for
win. A tiny score to be had, said the Indian supporters.
As the wicket was turning from bad to worse Imran saw his hour of
triumph coming. A great tactician he applied full pressure on the
Indians with a double spin attack of Tauseef and Qasim. Only the
experienced warhorse, Gavaskar, batted with comprehensive skill and
yet the Pakistani spinners won the day and honours for the visiting
squad. Imran's dream of beating India on their own soil had been
realised.
India made a return journey two years later for what was a dreary
drawn rubber. Since then Pakistan had in 1993 and 1994 tried to
undertake a tour of the neighbouring country - it was their turn to
have played in India - but the Hindu militants, especially the Shiv
Sena, an ally of the ruling BJP party, had been venting threats. In
fact the extremists dug up the pitch at Bombay's Wankhede Stadium to
disallow any team to make its appearance there.
As news has filtered through the print media that the Pakistan team
may be seen in action in the Indian towns Bal Thackeray, the head of
Shiv Sena, came out with the statement that he would stick to his
resolve even if it meant 'a divorce with its alliance partner'.
However, the Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee has promised
full protection to the visiting neighbours. No organisation or
individual would be allowed to obstruct the Pakistani cricket squad,
adding, "the government will see to it that the cricket team from
Pakistan during its tour is able to play without hindrances." The
Indian cricket board, on its part, said it would drop a fixture at
Bombay, which is the stronghold of the Hindu fundamentalists. The
dropping of the port city, previously a centre of cricket, would mean
a considerable loss in gate money and advertisement revenue but the
exchange of visits has to be revived and again Mohali, New Delhi,
Kanpur, the southern cities and Calcutta may welcome the visitors
from Pakistan with Indore, Baroda or Gwaliar ready to make
arrangements for Test or one-day internationals.
The five-day and instant cricket duels may help improve the strained
relations between the two States but would also give the chance to
the two sets to assess their strength and weakness much before
entering the fray in the seventh World Cup in the English summer next
year. It is possible the two countries may be able to discover new
talent.
Perhaps the administrators of the two countries, as also of Sri
Lanka, want a tentative agreement on the Asian Test championship to
set an example before the International Cricket Council for a global
competition of Test cricket. The latter has yet to thrash out a
format, a mode and method of such a championship. According to some
English writers, including Wisden's editor Matthew Engel, the points
systems may give the fairest result - perhaps in a period of four to
five years. But who will wait for such a long time for an ultimate
winner? The one-day popularity would supplant the significance of the
Tests; the classical five-day battle would sink into oblivion. Only
the historians and chroniclers will be talking of and writing about
the legendary exploits of the past masters for Test matches will lose
their value. Cricket's art and its first principles will wear out and
the varieties in bowling will vanish.
An Asian example of Test confrontations, packed in one season, may
hopefully awaken the Asian loss of ICC, Jagmohan Dalmiya, to the need
of a world five-day contest on the lines of the nascent cricket World
Cup. He may perhaps take up the issue with the full and associate
members of the international fraternity of cricket for no lover of
the game will like the Test matches to be pushed to the background
and the money-spinning one-dayers to become the major attraction of
modern-day cricket. Dalmiya should see to it that all aspects of the
subject are debated at the Lord's annual get-together or earlier than
that.
Source :: Dawn (https://dawn.com/)