South Africa face top-order juggling act (8 June 1999)
MANCHESTER (England) - As a side which has been plotting to win the World Cup since before the tour of England more than a year ago, South Africa have glued themselves closely to the plot
08-Jun-1999
8 June 1999
South Africa face top-order juggling act
Trevor Chesterfield
MANCHESTER (England) - As a side which has been plotting to win the
World Cup since before the tour of England more than a year ago, South
Africa have glued themselves closely to the plot.
But the form of the top order, so long a debating point in such a high
pressure tournament and one where serious questions are now emerging
about the mental attitude of the team's batsmen, may force the
selectors to make a couple of changes as the remaining two games of
the Super Six loom.
What may be seen in Edgbaston tomorrow where South Africa meet the
unlucky New Zealanders could be the shape of things to come. So far,
apart from the game against Pakistan, Hansie Cronje and Bob Woolmer
have so far played it strictly according to their 'best team
selection' policy. And with Peter Pollock also in agreement they have
dug in and resisted dropping either Gary Kirsten or Jonty Rhodes - or
both.
In fact not much has changed in terms of team personnel at all since
the game against India at Hove.
Now, however, with form being crucial and too much reliance on the
lower-order and the Lance Klusener factor to win matches, there is
extra pressure on who should open and likely to bat at three. There is
an argument to return Jacques Kallis to three, promote Klusener to six
and open with Daryll Cullinan and give Dale Benkenstein a chance and
retain Jonty Rhodes. Apart from improving the team's fielding depth,
especially in the circle, the bowling, which has been largely
responsible for the side's success in the tight games, the feeling is
that Benkenstein has the ability to bat well in tight situations.
Well, it is one argument and has had a grudging response from some
team sources who have admitted concern over top-order failures. Yet,
like negotiating a run with Inzamam-ul-Haq, nothing is certain. South
Africa have normally named a 12 on the eve of the game and left it at
that; so the guessing game continues. Benkenstein has been included in
the 12 twice which really means nothing: both times he was retained as
12th man. South Africa at least managed to get in a practice session
at Edgbaston which is more than they have managed to do leading up to
the Pakistan match at Trent Bridge last Saturday. As has been pointed
out a lack of concentrated batting practice has not helped players
such as Kirsten and Rhodes regain some form.
While the Kiwis know they need to win at Edgbaston to keep their
semi-final hopes afloat, South Africa's more serious concern is to
find what has gone wrong with the batting form.
Then again, the rain clouds which have hovered ominously around
England for more than a month can also wreck the game further. South
Africa are not in a position where one point from an abandoned match
is going to help their cause. At this stage of the tournament it is
becoming a little too tight.
Source :: Trevor Chesterfield, Pretoria News