Colourful minnows show their muscle (2 June 1999)
LONDON - Whatever way you look at it, the three sides representing the associate members of the International Cricket Council at this year's World Cup have been able thumb their respective noses at the Test nations without bothering too much to put a
02-Jun-1999
2 June 1999
Colourful minnows show their muscle
Trevor Chesterfield
LONDON - Whatever way you look at it, the three sides representing the
associate members of the International Cricket Council at this year's
World Cup have been able thumb their respective noses at the Test
nations without bothering too much to put a brave face on their
efforts.
Well, Scotland are a little miffed with themselves over how they
failed to make the impression they wanted and not beating Bangladesh,
yet even their argument of seeking limited-overs international status
should be looked at with some seriousness.
And the support each side received in England in World Cup '99 has
provided the staid English county grounds with the sort of colourful
display which no one can quibble about - well, perhaps the mad
after-match charge which are not allowed in most countries, have
marred much of the of the uninhibited yet enjoyable exuberance from
the Asian followers.
At some places the near bedlam has resulted in a few abrasions and
minor injuries and players having their gear nicked: Andy Flintoff his
bat, Saqlain Mushtaq a jersey and Steve Tikolo a cap, has been part of
the exercise.
Yet an examination of Bangladesh, Kenya and Scotland's record in the
first round is as dignified and more competent than those of Holland
and the United Arab Emirates in 1996 when the tournament was played
the Asian sub-continent. Kenya were able to celebrate a victory over a
West Indies side which later went on to beat South Africa in the
quarter-finals. Which proves how the shorter game can upset the
predictions of the sides who have an impressive, professional playing
structure.
As has been shown this year Zimbabwe have come through at the expense
of England: not so much that their system is better, or that they have
better players, but because of the luck of the draw and a coach who
has a belief which has put the side firmly in the minds of the people
where the game is played.
Anywhere, of course but Zimbabwe where the media all but ignored the
wins over India and South Africa. Then, what else can you expect from
a place such as Zimbabwe? There was strong evidence of black support
for South Africa's neighbours New Writtle Road ground in Cheltenham,
and it was not from some British-born West Indian group out to show
the flag for their black brethren.
They were students studying in London and went to cheer the with the
whites their side as much as did the coloured support for South Africa
who in Afrikaans pondered as they arrived at the station, whether
there would be any changes in "our team".
For those in South Africa who knock the transformation programme,
there is a significant message seeing a large, cheerful
Afrikaans-speaking woman with the multi-coloured flag of her country
draped around her ample shoulders. Just as significant has been the
efforts of Bangladesh, Kenya and Scotland to prove themselves as teams
of the ICC's global future. There are already signs of how Kenya and
Bangladesh have come through since being granted limited-overs
international status. Kenya may not have won a match this time but
their presence was always noted: Steve Tikolo and the consistent
opener Ravindu Shah were among the top 20 batsmen and Martin Suji's
bowling was steady and far from ordinary.
Kenya were also fourth among the teams who scored heavily in the last
10 overs of a match with 5.78, just behind South Africa (5.94) and
ahead of New Zealand and Australia tied in fifth place (5.52).
Bangladesh may not have produced too many memorable moments but their
bowling was more economical than Australia over the final 10 overs,
and Kenya and Scotland as well. No one can argue either with the
inclusion of their top player, Minhazul Abdien, in the side of teams
who made some impact in the first round, along with Scotland's Gavin
Hamilton.
"We need more exposure at this level if we are to progress," agreed
the Scottish coach, Jim Love, who felt the techniques of most batsmen
had been exposed, most that is except Hamilton, who is more
technically correct that most England players.
Scotland are likely to seek a form of LOI status from the ICC later
this month, and hopefully they will be granted this request.
As for Bangladesh, the win over Pakistan has off-loaded riches on the
players and a half-day of national celebration for the nation. Which
is fair enough, despite the way the result was contrived. After
watching the video replays of the highlights (about three times at the
last count) there is a suggestion of some Pakistan collusion at
Northampton. The sight of the heavyweight Inzamam-ul-Haq almost
sitting on his bat declining to run and watching Saeed Anwar
'sacrificed for the cause of Asian brotherhood,' as well as Ijaz Ahmed
walking down the pitch and chopping an inside edge into his stumps,
was a little too obvious.
Okay, no one can quibble over the two lbw decisions, not even Inzamam
is that clumsy, but questions can be asked about the hara-kiri run
outs of Azhar and Saqlain.
So, why does it not come as a major surprise that Bangladesh won? That
is the point: there are many who are pleased they did.
Sadly they have parted ways with their West Indian coach Gordon
Greenidge for a frank and honest answer to the question whether he
thought the country was ready for Test status.
"Not for some time. They need to get a three-day first-class structure
before they can think about such an application," was his answer. He
was fired for his honesty, which says much for a governing body, which
as with Sri Lanka, is at serious odds with itself.
Yet the value of the three countries is such they cannot be ignored as
has Zimbabwe by the bigger nations. Their victories in the last four
World Cups can be counted on the fingers of a batting glove.
Source :: Trevor Chesterfield, Pretoria News