Hansie's earpiece and Warne's outburst (27 May 1999)
Some of us were humoured, amused if you like, to find the ideal elegant looking South African Captain Hansie Cronje sporting an earpiece on the field, when the Indians were batting
27-May-1999
27 May 1999
Hansie's earpiece and Warne's outburst
Richard Dwight
Some of us were humoured, amused if you like, to find the ideal
elegant looking South African Captain Hansie Cronje sporting an
earpiece on the field, when the Indians were batting. Hansie has come
to be regarded as a well established, accomplished all-round leader
of international class. And as such has no need to have recourse to
receive instructions through an earpiece, especially while on the
field, where he as skipper is expected to be in control. It's simply
quite out of place and does not fit in with his widely accepted
cricketing personality. Furthermore, indirectly it is a manifestation
of a lack confidence in himself, the inability to act independently
and an insult to his own cricketing experience acquired through the
years. Not to mention the lowering of his stature and esteem amongst
the players he leads.
In this regard, at a panel discussion the other day the interviewer
asked Allan Lamb and Tony Greig as to what their views were on the
affixing of an earpiece while on the field.
Whilst Greig remained non committal, Lamb on the other hand said that
we live in an era of technological advances and must make use of them
- going on to commend the enterprising innovation of coach Bob
Woolmer and Cronje's right in having access to it. Our observation
however is, that the acknowledged practice is for the captain, if he
so wished, to receive guidance during the intervals and in the
dressing room or elsewhere. But certainly not through an earpiece on
the field, so as to devalue, and make him look stupid in the eyes of
millions watching.
What is significant to note is that the cricket syndrome has much to
do with nature. Played in the open on turf, has to contend with early
morning dew and dampness, fluctuations in bright and mild sunshine,
breeze, cloud cover, rain etc, in short the elements and not
forgetting as well human error, be it from the captain or his mates.
All this and more in its entirety accounts for the element of risk,
that leads to cricket's glorious uncertainties. This in a sense is
the backbone of the game to make it so enthralling. Reduce or
minimise this through erosions into cricket, in the name and guise of
technological advances then, the quintessence of the game itself is
lost.
True the third umpire although away from the field of play, has
become well established and proved useful. But what has been achieved
in the process, is to make the umpires out there in the middle
increasingly complacent and less alert. They tend to abdicate their
responsibilities, broadening out the areas of decision making to the
third umpire and relying much more on him to make them (out in
centre) in a sense redundant.
Reverting back to the interviewer on the panel discussion, he did for
want of time, gloss over the recriminations that ensued between Shane
Warne and Arjuna Ranatunga and, so did Lamb and Greig. But our view
on this, is that Warne could not have been so brazenly bold to say
what he said about Arjuna, without perhaps the support and backing of
some Sri Lankans now domiciled in Australia, with a particular
cricketer in mind, who may have apprised him on the goings on here.
Arjuna who is without peer, when it comes to reserving choice
epithets of invective for his adversaries, struck hard while the iron
was hot. Though Arjuna's rejoinder is factually correct he could have
done better to exercise tact and diplomacy to confine his comments to
Warne's cricket and not embarrassingly draw the country at large into
this.
From it we stand exposed, with the emerging question as to what we,
as a people with a culture and history of 2500 years have been doing
all these years to raise the standard and quality of life, as against
Australia.
Source :: Daily News (https://www.lanka.net)